Okay, I know there are some people that just don't like most of, if not all, the Inhumans and heck even I don't care for them as greatly as I think I could (even though I like them), but why is that? Yes, I do see the point that some people have about "the monarchy" being a small aspect of that hatred (I think Jimmy mentioned that one time as well

) Well I am starting to think the main reason they, as a group, are hated is a simple one ... they just don't look like us.
Now I know that sounds crazy. We all love insane looking characters, but as a group, when they are together, the Inhumans are the only collective I can think of with a high percentage of non-human looking characters. What other comic group/team has that .... (oh man) ... that
inhuman feature being their main difference?
The reason I started to think on this is not only from past experiences, but just a few minutes ago (which yes, admittedly, is still my past

) I read about two characters that could easily fit into the model of being an Inhuman. The powers are odd and they don't fit into society as well as they should and I even thought to myself-
"these would have been great Inhumans"
But then it hit me ... wait ... both of them "look" like "us" on the outside, they can't be Inhumans.
Of course I know that not all Inhumans look ... odd, but by and large, yes, they look odd and that got me thinking about the popularity of the X-Men. What is the difference in Inhuman and Mutant? Not much really, other than one is based on having your powers initiate when you get pubes and the other after you inhale some killer
weed gas.

But the main difference? The large portion of mutants LOOK like regular people while the large portion of Inhumans do not. Heck, even the Valiant universe has their "Psiots" which could easily be labeled Inhuman. Of course the Psiots are not yet as popular as the X-Men, and never will be most chances

, but they have a better shot at it looking the way they look trust me
Mutants, as a whole, don't look unusual. Even when mutants pair up for a team, you always have more "regular" looking characters than non-regular looking characters. The revamped X-Men had a German demon with a tail who left a sulphur smell after he "teleported" on their team (and if THAT doesn't sound inhuman I don't know what does) but he was surrounded by normal looking people and thus loved by the millions (or at least the thousands). Even short ass Wolverine looks "normal" for the most part. But I ask you, would the X-Men have ever become popular if the team was filled with a more "inhuman" aspect of great characters like:
Nightcrawler
Glob Herman
Beak
Skin
and then a normal looking character like Storm?
Hell no!!!
Just think of all the successful groups in comics. They have at least 70% normal looking characters, but not the Inhumans, noooo

Hell even my beloved Fantastic Four has a 75% human looking to beast looking ratio.
And don't say anything about the Turtles. Yes, they look different, but they are animals. Animals shouldn't count. Most everyone thinks at least one animal family is cute

Some even think the Polar Bear cute ... an animal who would kill you just as soon as look at you, people!!! He has BEAR in the name!!!

I think, and I am trying not to judge, but I think that anyone that does not celebrate the Inhumans for their greatness, for being truly amazing is a ... well ... you are nothing but a Gene'ists

. And THAT is something I will not stand for.
But seriously? Could the look, the oddity of the inhumans be one reason for their lack of greatness. Although that television show certainly killed any modern chance they had at becoming popular *shiver* Eeewwww. Just look at every other Kirby creation. Everyone, especially teams or groups, and you will see they have all outshone his odd little race of heroes. Sad is what that is. Sad.
Okay, my buzz is wearing off ... I am done
