Oops. sorry, meant to make my statement a question of rhetoric, as opposed as to how it came off as a directive at you.
No problem buddy. I no take it poorly regardless
LAWYER: Your honor, I object!
JUDGE: On what grounds?
LAWYER: Pure conjecture, sir. You can't objectively say the Pats would have two less Superbowls should 2 coaching calls had been different. At least, not without Ulyssess whispering in his ear.
JUDGE: Overruled, then.
Well nice use of Ulysses aside
, I did lay out that the future is not always predictable, however, no, it would be more like -
"I swear I did not kill that
"But your fingerprints are all over the
play you called and 114,000 million people watched you commit the crime"
"Well, but, if I ..."
"TO THE GAS CHAMBER!"